A Leftist Supports Islamist Hacking
"Look mate no disrespect but the yanks deserved it i mean look at them the greedy cunts cant just settle for there oil they would rather have somebody elses but other than that i am off on your site as i enjoy taking the piss out of muslims and also questioning there faith but only the extremists i have nothing against the ones that just want to live and smoke weed yurp.”
You stupid man! You basically accuse me of putting all Muslims in the same basket (‘extremists’ from ‘weed smokers’), yet you make a gross and brainless generalisation about ‘Yanks’. You say that every single Yank ‘deserves it’ (being hacked or worse?).
Don’t you realise that these Muslims don’t discriminate! They are hacking every single kuffar on the planet. They are hacking mainstream Christian groups, all patriotic groups, any group that’s pro-American, pro-British, pro-Western... any group that dares criticise any aspect of Islam or any behaviour of Muslims in any way whatsoever. Any group or page that dare express its kuffarness.
They cannot take criticism in any shape. Islam remained untouched for 1, 400 years. Any criticism resulted in death. Anyone who gave upon Islam was murdered. Anyone who didn’t say the right things in the right way about Islam was killed, persecuted or imprisoned. That’s why these absolutist zealots will hack and kill every ‘arrogant’ kuffar on earth if they could. These people won’t stop till the ‘whole world belongs to Allah’. They have repeatedly said this and they fucking mean it!
I am a bigot
"Or religious preference or ethnicity or sexual orientation.bigotry is ever present in some form-I myself am a music bigot,who refuses to let cockends like justin-spawn of satan-beiber and all the other banale incubii on mtv enter my musical consciousness.”
He’s right. We’re all bigots. He’s a bigot. I’m a bigot. You’re a bigot. Problem is, the Left makes a big political song and dance about being against bigotry. Thus they portray themselves, like the self-righteous gits they are, as being non-bigots. But all you need to do is scratch these hypocrites for one second and their own bigotries begin to stink out the area.
But they are the right things to be bigoted against. They are righteous bigotries. The list is long: ‘racists’, ‘bigots’, ‘the far right’, ‘Tories’, fox-hunters, ‘neo-liberals’, ‘neo-conservatives’, ‘Zionists’, ‘fascists’, ‘Islamophobes’, ‘reactionaries’, people who don’t like reggae, ‘toffs’ (which is odd, because many of the leaders of the Left are toffs), etc. And, of course, they are bigoted against all ‘bigots’.
So bigots are all the people who don’t believe what they believe. They are all the people who have different lifestyles to them. In other words, the Left, especially the Far Left (SWP/UAF/Commies/Trots, Hope Not Hate/Searchlight/etc.) display all the things which should and do characterise true bigotry.
Am I bigoted? It depends really if it is seen as negative. But I’ll say yes. I’m very bigoted against Leftists, and, bizarrely, against the many Muslims who want to kill me and destroy everything I hold dear. How bigoted of me!
Muslim grooming and sexual abuse
'Whites are more likely to be paedophiles and groomers than Muslims.’
But do they systematically do so in gangs that are joined together because of the members' religion? No.
Do they systematically seek out girls who aren’t members of their own religion? No.
Do their brothers, uncles, etc. also commit these grooming offences with them? No.
You call them 'Christian gangs'. In fact, they are gangs who sometimes happen to be Christian. They are also members who happen to be Christian but to whom Christianity is more or less irrelevant. To call these gangs ‘Christian’ is ridiculous.
So why do I call these gangs ‘Muslim’? Try actually reading the post. I also like how you keep on fusing ‘white’ and ‘Christian’, which is exactly what Muslims do.
Of course Muslim women may get raped by non-Muslims (though extremely rarely). But read the post again. Do these white or non-Muslim abuser seek out Muslims? Absolutely not!
Of course brothers, uncles, etc. are sometimes involved (rarely) - but not systematically and culturally, as in the Muslim case. And not because they believe that what they’re doing is not wrong - again, as in the Muslim case.
Brainwashed by the Media?
“So much ignorance in one page most of you dont even have a clue about islam you only go by what the media or hate sites say.”
The classic Leftists and Muslim riposte. Except it’s not really a riposte at all. More a soundbite in the form of a cliché in the form of a wet fart.
The bottom line is that if you're critical of any aspect of Islam, or any behaviour of any Muslims (as Muslims), then you simply must have been ‘brainwashed’ by the platonic Media, Press, etc. They, of course, have not been brainwashed by the Muslim media or by Leftist websites because what they say about Islam and Muslims is positive. That’s how simple it is, really.
What is this Media/Press that Muslims and the Left keep on going on about? Is that the media which includes the Guardian, the New Statesman, the Independent, Socialist Worker and many other Leftist rags? In any case, most people rely on the millions of websites on the Internet nowadays. Is that the Media too? Or is anything ‘the Media’ if it is simply critical of Islam and of Muslims?
Where should we get a true view of Islam? From The Guardian or Socialist Worker? From the Koran, perchance? From a Muslim? Really?
And why do you simply assume that all critics of Islam and Muslims haven’t read that despicable book - the Koran or any of the filthy Islamist sites which pollute the Internet?
This is a typical case of patronising all critics of Islam. They must be 'brainwashed' because they disagree with me! Muslims say exactly the same thing. Only someone who believes what I believe is not brainwashed by the Media.
You fucking arrogant gits! Not one buys it accept Muslims and Leftists and no one gives a shit about them except Muslims and Leftists.